WASHINGTON — A California law banning a barbaric, wacko and discredited therapy that tries to convert gay and lesbian teenages to heterosexual and was lampooned on “South Park” does not violate the Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.
SUPREME COURT RULING
On Monday, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the California ban — the first of its kind in the nation that outlaws “conversion therapy” for minors. That ruling keeps in place a lower federal court ruling that upheld the state law, which was passed in 2012.
The Supreme Court justices did not comment in refusing to hear the appeal.
It was the second time the Supreme Court has turned away a challenge to the California law, SB 1172.
RELATED: ‘Kidnapped for Christ’ director says Christian camp abused gay youth
RELATED: Ex-gay therapy horrors spotlighted in ‘Kidnapped for Christ’ film
‘PRAY THE GAY AWAY’
The therapy is also called “pray the gay away” and “ex-gay conversion therapy.”
It became infamous after the 2007 “South Park” episode “Cartman Sucks.” Butters Stotch’s parents thought he was “bi-curious” and sent to him a pray-the-gay-away camp, where several youth committed suicide after being told they were sexually confused.
The appeal challenging the ban was filed by a Christian minister in San Diego and others, who argued that the law violated their rights to religious freedom.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco had previously upheld the California law as constitutional.
APPEALS COURT RULING
In August 2013, the Court of Appeals unanimously concluded that the ban did not violate the free speech rights of therapists and was within the state’s authority to outlaw medical or mental health practices it considers harmful to minors. The court also rejected the argument the law interferes with parents’ rights to seek such counseling for their children.
The California law, which was authored by Rep. Ted Lieu (D-33), who was then a state senator from Torrance, says that therapists and counselors who use “sexual orientation change efforts” on clients under 18 would be engaging in unprofessional conduct and subject to discipline by state licensing boards.